INDIANAPOLIS (AP) — A federal appeals court on Friday put on hold a judge’s order striking down Indiana’s gay marriage ban, bringing same-sex marriages to a halt and leaving those who’ve already tied the knot in legal limbo.
The U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals in Chicago issued the order two days after U.S. District Judge Richard Young had that Indiana’s prohibition on same-sex marriage was unconstitutional.
State attorneys had asked for a stay of Young’s ruling while it appeals. The attorney general’s office argued it was premature to require Indiana to change its definition of marriage until the U.S. Supreme Court weighs in on the issue as is widely expected.
In staying Young’s order requiring the state to allow same-sex marriages, the appeals court followed the lead of courts across the country, which have granted stays of similar rulings at either the district or appellate level until appeals can decide the issue.
Indiana law defines marriage as between a man and a woman, and the state has refused to recognize same-sex marriages performed in states where it is legal. Young wrote in his ruling that such restrictions violated the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution and noted that courts across the country have agreed.
“In time, Americans will look at marriages of couples such as Plaintiffs, and simply refer to it as a marriage — not a same-sex marriage,” he wrote. “These couples, when gender and sexual orientation are taken away, are in all respects like the family down the street. The Constitution demands we treat them as such.”
Young’s ruling allowed same-sex couples to file joint tax returns, receive pension benefits and have their partners listed as spouses on death certificates.
But how the stay will affect them remains to be seen. Legal experts say couples may need to enlist legal help to sort through the process.
Earlier Friday advocates of same sex marriage picketed the Clay County Courthouse. Clay County was one of two Wabash Valley counties refusing to issue licenses to gay couples.
Same sex marriage advocates in Clay County believe the clerk’s delay was just waiting for this type of ruling.
“We think that they are delaying so that they are stalling until the stay comes through,” Ashley Rogers of Clay County said. “We don’t want one, but yes we are anticipating and we think that it’s a stall tactic.”